Welcome to the PowerDMARC updates 👋
together we can discuss new ideas, suggestions and solve issues to make our service even better for you. How would you rate your experience?
Changelog
together we can discuss new ideas, suggestions and solve issues to make our service even better for you.
Feedback
together we can discuss new ideas, suggestions and solve issues to make our service even better for you.
Agree with this, I would like to see the scoring/domain health reports identify whether a domain is Inactive/Parked (Which it already knows for billing) and if it is Parked, score the domain based on having the properly configured hardening rules as recommended without grading non relevant services. This would allow us to show customers a correct grading for their overall domains given Parked Domains do not have MTA-STS/Hosted DKIM/BIMI etc.
See also. https://changelog.powerdmarc.com/feedback/142503
I think PowerDMARC uses a wrong definition of an inactive/parked domain.
Currently PowerDMARC is requiring a null/empty/non-existing MX record.
This is a bit strange in our opinion, since DMARC, SPF and DKIM are all about sending email, while MX records are about sending email. We cannot think of any use case where a customer would use your services if we block all outgoing mail with properly configured SPF, DMARC and DKIM records.
In our opinion a domain should be marked as inactive/parked with properly configured SPF, DMARC and DKIM records, regardless of the MX records.